|
The Star, October 20, 2007
Biotech or bust
By ERROL OH
errol @thestar com my
SOMEWHERE in The Big Book of Public Service DOS and
Don’ts, there must surely be a line or two
discouraging heads of government and
government-linked bodies from issuing dire prognoses
for the Malaysian economy. If indeed there were,
Datuk Iskandar Mizal Mahmood has skipped that part.
The CEO of Malaysian Biotechnology Corp Sdn Bhd (BiotechCorp)
is convinced that our prosperity will soon be
jeopardised if we persist with the Old Economy ways.
It is a message he is anxious to get across to
everybody, more so the local business community.
(BiotechCorp) is wholly owned by the Minister of
Finance Inc and is placed under the purview of the
Science Technology and Innovation Ministry)
He argues that the country’s GDP growth will start
to sputter in less than a decade as long as it
relies heavily on traditional sectors such as
property and manufacturing.
This is because amid globalisation and mounting
competition, Malaysia will find it increasingly
difficult to attract investments and expand exports.
Says Iskandar “So where is our competitive
advantage?”. Technology is our competitive
advantage. Innovation is our competitive advantage.
“If our companies do not open their minds to what
technology and research and development (R&D) can
do, and how we can use technology to scale up to the
next level, I worry for my children”.
That sounds dramatic, but such a notion is neither
new nor endemic to Malaysia. From his office
bookshelves Iskandar pulls Rising Above the
Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America
for a Brighter Economic Future.
It is a recent report by an A-list committee set up
by the United States’ National Academies, which are
billed as “advisers to the nation on science,
engineering and medicine”, to figure out how the US
can enhance its science and technology so as to stay
competitive in the 21st century.
To Iskandar, the report is an unshakeable testament
to the urgent need for Malaysians to appreciate
innovativeness as an economic strength.
Chaired by Lockheed Martin Corp ex CEO Norman
Augustine, the committee acknowledges that the rest
of the world is catching up with the US in science
and technology.
“Some will argue that this is a problem for market
forces to resolve but that is exactly the concern.
Market forces are already at work moving jobs to
countries with less costly, often better educated,
highly motivated workforces and friendlier tax
policies,” the report points out.
“Without a renewed effort to bolster the foundations
of our competitiveness, we can expect to lose our
privileged position. For the first time in
generations, the nation’s children could face poorer
prospects than their parents and grandparents did”
The case for biotechnology
Nobody can accuse the Malaysian Government of
ignoring the importance of science and technology.
There have been many initiatives to address this
aspect, and one of these is the plan to make
biotechnology a key component of the country’s
development strategy.
Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi
launched the National Biotechnology Policy in April
2005.
At the event, he said: “Biotechnology will not only
drive improvements in the quality of life of
Malaysians; it will also propel the creation of
knowledge and innovation in the country, crucial
elements in our quest to climb up to a higher
value-added stage of development.
“With the application of biotechnology, we can
unlock additional value in traditionally strong
sectors such as plant commodities and manufacturing.
We can create substantial value in new and upcoming
sectors such as healthcare, nutraceuticals and
industrial bioprocessing”.
The policy charts a 15-year course that will
ultimately see Malaysia as a global biotechnology
and R&D hub by 2020. A policy is only as good as its
execution, and that is primarily an assignment for
BiotechCorp, which was established to spearhead the
development of Malaysia’s biotechnology sector.
There are targets in place. The aim is for
biotechnology to contribute at least 5% to the
country’s GDP by 2020. The plan also includes having
100 new biotechnology companies that will create
280,000 jobs
The centrepiece initiative is the BioNexus Network,
“a web of biotechnology companies and organisations
that leverage on existing facilities, infrastructure
and capabilities of universities and research
institutions throughout Malaysia”. So far, 39
companies have obtained BioNexus status.
Malaysia has identified three focus areas in
biotechnology – agricultural, healthcare and
industrial.
BiotechCorp’s website broadly defines biotechnology
as “any technique which uses living organisms to
make or modify products, improve plant or animal
productivity or to develop micro-organisms for
specific use”.
However, Iskandar prefers to make it simple:
“Biotechnology is merely an enabler. It s just a
science or a technology that allows us to come up
with products and services”.
Of more significance is the idea that if Malaysia
succeeds in biotechnology, this smoothes the way for
the country’s transition to the knowledge economy.
The potential is great because biotechnology can
touch our lives in just about every facet - from
food to healthcare and medicine from the ecosystem
to industrial processes.
For example, it leads to drug discoveries, higher
crop and meat yields, new materials and a cleaner
environment.
“The pervasiveness of this technology is of utmost
importance. When it’s pervasive enough, it reaches
people in two ways – there’s economic and societal
impact,” Iskandar explains.
Why Malaysia?
There is no doubt that biotechnology is hot.
Malaysia is not the only country that is looking to
ride on the high-growth industry.
The US has benefited from a head start and is home
to several of the world’s leading biotechnology
clusters.
However, other developed countries have narrowed the
gap. Among the chasing pack are Canada, Britain, the
Netherlands, Sweden, Finland and Japan.
The battle for biotech dollars among the newcomers
is even more intense in our region. As always, on
sheer size alone, China and India cannot be
dismissed, but the ones that have been noticeably
aggressive are Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong
Kong Australia and New Zealand.
Clearly it takes a lot to stand out in the crowd,
particularly when vying for investments from
multinational biotechnology players.
Companies that have BioNexus status enjoy certain
tax incentives. There is also a bill of guarantees
the spells out a set of privileges.
Yet, these alone cannot possibly counter the
strategy of say, Singapore, which has reportedly
spent huge amounts of money to lure big-name
scientists to the island republic to kick start its
biotechnology dream.
Malaysia, Iskandar says, has the edge when it comes
to biodiversity human capital and operating
environment.
The wide variety of plants and animals here is a
selling point, but while is more crucial to the
development of the Malaysian biotechnology industry
is the largely untapped lot understanding of the
properties of these flora and fauna.
“Starting from now, there’ll be lot of emphasis on
utilising this knowledge and bringing it to the
market.” says Iskandar.
He adds that the fact that biotechnology companies
from India and China are interested in coming to
Malaysia shows that the country has sustainable
human capital to supply the industry.
“It’s almost unbelievable. But do talk to some of
these companies,” suggests.
BiotechCorp augments this competitive advantage with
training a mentoring programmes for graduates
entrepreneurs and other industry participants.
He also corrects the perception that Malaysia lacks
depth in R&D. He points out, “We have so many good
research institutes and universities. I’m actually
quite taken aback by the criticism thrown at them,
that the have not been producing good sciences.”
Another important consideration for biotechnology
companies inventing abroad is that they will not be
hampered by bureaucracy and inefficiency. They
expect both the Government - in Malaysia,
BiotechCorp acts as a one-stop agency - and the
private sector to have a firm grasp of their
business and to provide speedy assistance.
Banking on BioNexus
Inevitably, the efforts to build the biotechnology
industry in Malaysia are likened to the nation’s
push to embrace ICT (information and communications
technology) beginning in late 1990s.
It may not be a fair comparison, but there are
distinct similarities.
Both are about rapidly evolving technologies that
are reshaping the world and its economies.
BiotechCorp is regarded as the equivalent of the
Multimedia Development Corp, while BioNexus is a
mirror of the Multimedia Super Corridor (now known
as MSC Malaysia) project.
Top international names in the respective fields
have been invited to be members of advisory bodies
to provide guidance and networking opportunities.
The basic objectives are the same - if the projects
take off in a big way, Malaysia will accelerate into
the Information Age.
Hence, if MSC Malaysia is seen as an
under-performer, it is natural for people to be
sceptical about Malaysia’s ambition to be a
biotechnology power.
Iskandar has heard this many times before. He
considers it a good thing that there was the MSC
experience to draw on during the formulation of the
National Biotechnology Policy.
He recalls, “We already had a template. So where are
the pitfalls? How could we do things better? We
needed to hit the ground running and we needed to do
it fast. So we looked at MSC, made comparisons and
improvised.”
Although promoting foreign direct investments is one
of its priorities, BiotechCorp places equal emphasis
on developing homegrown capabilities.
The idea is for the multinational corporations
(MNCs) to provide that spark for local biotechnology
entrepreneurs.
“With BioNexus, we are more fixated with quality
rather than quantity. This is not about a lottery,”
Iskandar explains.
“We want the foreign companies to be a catalyst for
the ecosystem. This is another thing we have learnt
from studying the MSC. We want to build an ecosystem
rather than relying on first bringing in the big
MNCs. We want build local industries from the very
beginning.”
|